Skip to main content

3RT20152AK61 vs 3RT20172BB41 — parameter matrix

Comparison matrix

Industrial parameter delta view (differing rows only). Toggle highlight to stress changed cells for cabinet retrofit reviews.

Normalized specification differences for 3RT20152AK61 and 3RT20172BB41
Parameter3RT20152AK613RT20172BB41
Coil Voltage120VAC24VDC
Must Operate Voltage96 VAC19.2 VDC
Base Product Number3RT20153RT2017
Coil Current-166.7 mA
Coil Power26.4VA4 W
Coil Resistance-144Ohms
Contact Rating (current)7 A12 A
Operate Time35 ms-
Release Time14 ms-

Table lists differing catalog rows only; highlight calls attention to the delta cells.

Catalog selection insight

One-line delta from headline spec rows — screening language only, not a suitability or substitution decision.

3RT20152AK61: supply / I/O voltage headline differs from 3RT20172BB41 (120VAC vs 24VDC) — re-check fuse sizing, surge rating, and SELV/PELV boundaries. 3RT20152AK61: headline supply differs from 3RT20172BB41 — treat as a different electrical platform until PSU, protection, and I/O are revalidated (not a same-rail swap by catalog text alone).

Technical screening notes (catalog snapshot)

Deterministic text from normalized spec keys — not live field-application-engineering advice or manufacturer sign-off.

Technical screening note for 3RT20152AK61 vs 3RT20172BB41: this catalog snapshot lacks obvious isolation/EMC/protocol rows — expand the PDP specification table or open the PDF for creepage, surge, and bus timing before any design change.

Catalog screening tiers (heuristic)

Three non-authoritative screening tiers (mechanical token, functional checklist, planning notes) mirror the JSON-Ld ItemList on this page — not manufacturer substitution letters or field approvals.

  • Mechanical / packaging row (not interchange)

    No substantive shared package token — treat as independent mechanical designs, not a hot swap, until your own checks pass.

  • Functional screening checklist

    Run isolation, supply range, bus timing, and software/runtime checks against your deployed baseline. Matching tokens here do **not** prove interchange — only your qualification tests do.

  • Design-change planning notes

    If you intend a product change, favor wider temperature, higher isolation withstand, or newer fieldbus only **after** manufacturer guidance, software licensing, and enclosure clearance are confirmed — not from this matrix alone.

3RT20152AK61 vs 3RT20172BB41

Tool-style compare: isolation, supply, IP, rail, fieldbus, and EMC rows are surfaced first when present. Open each PDP for PDF revisions and RFQ.

Compatibility screening (catalog text)

Same deterministic tiers as the compare module above — for engineering checklists only, not approved alternates. Supply, protocol, and processor headline mismatches surface as warnings when present.

  1. 1. Mechanical / packaging row (not interchange)

    No substantive shared package token — treat as independent mechanical designs, not a hot swap, until your own checks pass.

  2. 2. Functional screening checklist

    Run isolation, supply range, bus timing, and software/runtime checks against your deployed baseline. Matching tokens here do **not** prove interchange — only your qualification tests do.

  3. 3. Design-change planning notes

    If you intend a product change, favor wider temperature, higher isolation withstand, or newer fieldbus only **after** manufacturer guidance, software licensing, and enclosure clearance are confirmed — not from this matrix alone.

Technical compliance & certifications

Values below are extracted from normalized catalog specification keys and brand-level certification lists (where present). They mirror manufacturer datasheet legends when those strings were captured in the catalog row — not a certificate download. This page was machine-aligned on 2026-05-12 for technical selection support only; it is not the sole basis for installation or safety sign-off in your jurisdiction.

3RT20152AK61

  • RoHS / restricted substances statements

3RT20172BB41

  • RoHS / restricted substances statements